Socialism is the Best Medicine

Socialism is the Best Medicine

Does Capitalism Make Us Crazy?

October 1, 2021


Does capitalism make us crazy? The short answer is YES!

Life under capitalist rule is perilous. We cannot survive on our own, and we cannot rely on society to support us. We live with perpetual uncertainty: Can I pay my bills? Will I lose my home, my job? What happens if I’m sick or injured? Add the constant threat of racism, war, and climate change disasters.

Do you feel safe in this world? I don’t. Every morning, I wake up with a sense of dread, thinking, “OMG. I’m still here, and this is still happening.” I am not alone in this.

A ten-country survey of 10,000 young people, aged 16 to 25, inquired what they thought and felt about climate change. Sixty percent felt very or extremely worried. More than half felt sad, anxious, angry, powerless, helpless, and guilty. Seventy-seven percent saw the future as frightening, and 56 percent believe that humanity is doomed.

This breaks my heart. And it shows how desperately we need a social revolution.

Psychologists see it differently: The Good Grief Network offers

A unique 10-Step Program to help individuals and communities build resilience by creating spaces where people can lean into their painful feelings about the state of the world and reorient their lives toward meaningful action.

The American Psychological Association advises fostering optimism, creating household emergency plans, and expanding mental-health services.

Promoting a false sense of control is no substitute for the real control we could have by organizing to end capitalist rule and the miseries it creates.


Marxists approach every problem from the perspective that there are two social classes, and what benefits the one harms the other.

For capitalists to accumulate capital, they must deny the majority any meaningful control over their work, their lives, or the direction of society. It’s a huge challenge to trap a highly social species in such a dehumanizing social arrangement.

Force alone is insufficient. Workers vastly outnumber capitalists, are intelligent problem-solvers, and run the machinery of society. They must be systematically bamboozled into resigning themselves to capitalist rule. One way to “manufacture consent” is to convince people that they are responsible for causing their own suffering and for overcoming it. A multi-billion-dollar wellness industry cashes in on this belief.

While psychology acknowledges the impact of harmful social conditions, its remedies are individual. This sends the message that the individual must adapt to the world as it is, not organize to change it.

Capitalism creates mass psychological distress by denying workers the information, tools, and social power to secure their well-being. Psychology responds to this suffering by helping individuals construct imaginary bubbles that provide an illusion of safety and control. Friend, family, and group bubbles form around shared interests or activities. While these bubbles provide a sense of connection and shared reality, they are easily ruptured. Under the strain of social crises, more people are losing their jobs and homes, relationships are breaking down, and murder rates and drug-related deaths are at record highs.

Marxism vs psychology

Psychology is a broad discipline with many branches; however, all psychological disciplines share a common theoretical foundation that conflicts with marxism:

• Marxism examines society from a class-struggle perspective. Psychology examines society from an individual perspective.

• Psychology assumes two separate realms: a public, economic realm governed by capitalism and a private, psychological realm governed by psychology. Marxists insist that we live in one realm, a capitalist realm that shapes every aspect of life.

• Marxism aims to transform human experience through social revolution. Psychology strives to adapt individuals to capitalism as an alternative to social revolution.

• Marxism offers the possibility of a caring socialist society. Psychology offers caring relationships as a substitute for a caring society.

While academics strive to integrate marxism and psychology, these contradictions make it impossible.

We don’t need a psychological model to explain mass suffering under capitalism; we can use the marxist method to explain it and, more importantly, show us how to end it.

The threat response

All living organisms respond to threat with an automatic biological defense system. In mammals, the threat response takes the form of flight, fight, or freeze. Which one is activated depends on a split-second, subconscious assessment of what will best secure survival.

Once the threat response is activated, a cascade of stress hormones, including adrenaline, surges through the body, activating the immune system, raising blood pressure, making the heart pound, breathing quicken, and muscles tense in order to prepare the body to flee, fight, or freeze. This emergency response evolved to be short-lived. You escape the lion or you don’t.

Under capitalism, threat is ever-present and seemingly inescapable. Those with the least social power experience the greatest threat.

As a Black man in America, I am kept awake by the absolute helplessness of being in my shoes, the fear and anger and confusion. There is no pairing of words or public display that will ever get you to understand what it’s like to walk and breathe and live in constant fear of being yourself. That when I say I am Black and proud, and when I say my life matters, someone will be there every time to deny it. To judge it and mock it. And to take it from me

Being threatened, remembering being threatened, and anticipating being threatened can all activate the human threat response. In the 1950s, Hans Selye discovered that conditions of sustained threat lead first to exhaustion, then organ failure, then premature death.

While we may seem to cope on the surface, our bodies protest with chronic pain, insomnia, digestive and respiratory problems, diabetes, heart disease, immune system disorders, and deep psychological distress.

Inequality is a threat

For hundreds of thousands of years, human beings relied on strong social bonds to survive. Inequality ruptures social relationships, so hunter-gatherer societies were fiercely egalitarian. They would not tolerate boasting or arrogance. Their first line of defense was ridicule. If someone acted superior, the rest of the group, and especially the elders, would ridicule that person until proper humility was shown.

Perversely, capitalists celebrate inequality as a marker of their success, of their ability to profit from the work of others. The more capital is extracted, the more unequal society becomes. The result is mass activation of the threat response: Workers fear for their survival, and capitalists fear losing their wealth.

Our bodies know our place in the class hierarchy, even when we don’t. Children show rising levels of stress hormones as their social position falls. Simply speaking with someone of higher social status will raise your blood pressure. Over the past 3 decades, inequality has increased, and the prevalence of high blood pressure has doubled.

One study measured the threat response of high-school students who were doing well academically. Upper-class students showed a brief spike of stress hormones followed by a quick decline, while working-class students showed a prolonged rise of stress hormones that took longer to decline. Working-class students experience more background threats that keep their threat response activated.

A 1998 study of 282 metropolitan areas in the United States found that greater income inequality was directly linked with higher death rates at all income levels. Researchers calculated that reducing inequality to the level found in the areas with the lowest inequality (not eliminating inequality, just reducing it) would save as many lives as would be saved by eradicating heart disease or by preventing all deaths from lung cancer, diabetes, motor vehicle crashes, HIV infection, homicide, and suicide combined.

Another study, released just this month, supports these findings. Before the 1990s, average life expectancy in the US was similar to that in Germany, the UK, or France. Since then, inequality has surged in the US, and American life spans have fallen. Now, at every age, Americans die earlier than their European counterparts. Even extremely impoverished Europeans live longer than wealthy Americans.

There have been many, many such studies.

ACE study

Consider the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study, the largest ongoing investigation into the connection between adverse childhood experiences and adult health.

As the number of adverse childhood experiences rises, there is a corresponding increase in physical, psychological, and social problems, including: lung, heart, and liver disease; diabetes; obesity; intimate partner violence; adolescent pregnancy; bone fractures; cancer; chronic pain; tobacco, alcohol, and drug addiction; attempted suicide; premature death; and all forms of mental distress.

Racialized people, poor people, disabled people, and gender rebels suffer significantly more adverse effects in childhood and, as a result, more physical, psychological, and social difficulties as adults.

While these findings have never been refuted, they have not been incorporated into capitalist medicine.

Regardless of the cause of their problems, all sufferers are directed to consult a physician. Because social supports are grossly underfunded and difficult to access, people are offered drugs, but not all drugs, just the profitable ones produced by the medical-pharmaceutical industry. So the doctor reaches for the prescription pad, cementing the mistaken belief that suffering is an individual medical problem and not the inevitable consequence of capitalist oppression.

Sounding the alarm

The flight, fight, and freeze responses are involved in all forms of mental distress.

The flight response can be expressed as addictions, obsessions, and compulsions that enable us to hide from what we cannot bear. The fight response can be expressed as irritability, anger, or rage directed at one’s self or others. The freeze response can be expressed as depression, numbness, or dissociation.

Dissociation was first identified in the late 19th century by Jean-Martin Charcot, a physician working at a Paris asylum. Charcot was deeply affected by the mass rebellion that peaked in the Paris Commune. Instead of dismissing his patients as raving lunatics, he listened to their stories of trauma and abuse.

Charcot’s student, Pierre Janet, proposed that some experiences are so overwhelming that they cannot be integrated into a person’s understanding of the world, so they are split off from conscious awareness. These dissociated fragments of traumatic experience can intrude into a person’s consciousness as distressing thoughts, feelings, and images that sufferers try to block with obsessive thoughts and compulsive rituals. While such behavior may seem crazy, Janet insisted that dissociation helps people manage unbearable trauma by psychologically disconnecting them from the experience.

Some traumatized children of refugees sink into a coma-like state called resignation syndrome. They cannot be roused and must be nourished through feeding tubes. Dissociation offers these children an escape from what they cannot face.

Dissociation explains why the majority put up with capitalist barbarism. If you can’t change anything, why try? Why even think about it? You’ve probably experienced this. You’re talking with someone and their eyes glaze over. Psychologically, they are no longer present, because what you are saying is too distressing for them to process.

The threat response keeps the nervous system on ‘high alert’ to the slightest hint of danger. This hyper-arousal is expressed as restlessness, hyper-activity, or emotional excitement.

Hyper-arousal inevitably leads to exhaustion that is expressed as fatigue, numbness, or depression. Sufferers can alternate between anxious hyper-arousal and exhausted depression. Both are intensely uncomfortable, compelling many to self-medicate with tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs. Distracting activities in the form of obsessions and compulsions can also provide relief.

When hyper-arousal becomes overwhelming, a person’s sense of self may start to disintegrate, making it difficult to know what is real. Such altered states can feel extremely threatening and contribute to further hyper-arousal and more disintegration. When there is no hope of relief, suicide offers the ultimate escape.

The brain-body

What I’ve just explained is not common knowledge, because the majority are not taught human anatomy and physiology in school (other than reproductive plumbing). Alienating us from knowledge of our bodies makes us dependent on experts who can feed us false information.

If you had a basic understanding of the human body, you would know that what we call the mind is a complete fiction.

The human brain floats inside a dark and silent bony cage. Its function is to make sense of the world it inhabits by minding the 100 million messages per second it receives from every cell in the body. The brain references, interprets, and responds to this information, correcting course as new information arrives. This process of minding the internal and external environment is what the brain-body does. We think with our entire bodies, we feel with our entire bodies, and we experience and respond to capitalism with our entire bodies.

A brain can be healthy, sick, or diseased because the brain is a physical organ. What we call ‘the mind’ can be none of these things because ‘the mind’ is not an organ but a function. Minding is what the brain-body does.

Consider the dancer and the dance. The dance is not a thing; it is the activity of the dancer, just as ‘the mind’ is the activity of the brain-body. If we declare the dance or the mind to be healthy, sick, or diseased, then we are using these terms as stand-ins for acceptable and unacceptable, which makes them value judgments, not medical assessments.

The claim that ‘the mind’ can be sick or diseased only makes sense if ‘the mind’ is reduced to the brain and if the brain is separated from the body and its social environment. The concepts of mental health, mental illness, and mental disease do just that.

To serve the capitalist system, psychology extracts the individual from society, splits the brain from the body, and drugs the brain in order to change the mind or, at least silence the sufferer.

‘Balancing’ brain chemicals?

It is commonly believed that mental suffering is caused by an imbalance of chemicals in the brain that can be corrected with psychiatric drugs. This would be laughable if it didn’t result in such tremendous harm.

Recall that the nervous system transmits 100 million messages per second to the brain. This means the chemistry of the brain is constantly changing. It’s impossible to measure the composition of chemicals in a living brain. Even if you could, it would be different the next second and the second after that.

When a drug raises the level of hormones, such as serotonin or dopamine, the brain responds by culling receptors for those hormones. In other words, psychiatric drugs create a chemical imbalance in the brain that the brain attempts to correct. This is why reducing or quitting these drugs leaves the person hormone deficient, creating the very condition the drug was promoted to cure.

Globally, psychiatric drugs are a $30 billion-a-year industry based on a lie. The theory that mental distress is caused by an imbalance of chemicals in the brain is no more valid than the theory that physical disease is caused by an imbalance of humors in the blood. We would all know this if we had a basic knowledge of anatomy and physiology. So why don’t doctors know it?

Many do, and quite a few protest. However, the pharmaceutical industry uses its financial and political power to discredit critics who expose its fraudulent theories, defective research, and harmful practices.

What is crazy?

In popular speech, ‘crazy’ means ‘outside a shared sense of reality,’ for example, “That’s crazy!”

Capitalists cannot allow workers to have a shared sense of reality. To sustain their rule, the business class must impose their interpretation of reality on everyone else. As Marx observed, the ideas that dominate society are those that serve the dominant class.

Alienated work makes people sick, and they get sicker when denied time off work to recover. To hide the health-damaging reality of exploitation, the workers’ experience is minimized or dismissed. The myth that work is health-promoting implies that sick or injured workers must be malingering and should be challenged for their own good. The disabled worker is trapped in a crazy-making nightmare where their suffering is discounted, and they are pressured to return to work or quit, relieving employers and insurers of any further obligation.

Divide and rule

We cannot experience the world outside of us directly. We can only interpret it through our senses. This interpretation, our sense of reality, depends on the social context.

Alienation disconnects our understanding of reality from that of others. More than one in four Americans believe the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump, and nine percent believe that use of force is justified to restore him to the presidency. More than half this group believe that “A secret group of Satan-worshiping pedophiles is ruling the US government.”

Capitalist ideology is full of crazy-making contradictions: We are told that racist inequality is based on biological differences; and we are told that anyone can make it if they try. ‘Free markets’ are based on wage slavery; imperialism parades as liberation; and war poses as humanitarian intervention.

Working-class behavior, such as striking, seems crazy to the middle and capitalist classes. And while destroying the environment for profit makes sense to the ruling class, it seems crazy to everyone else. Women and men do not share the same sense of reality, nor do White and Black people. The COVID-vaccinated think it’s crazy to reject the vaccine, while anti-vaxxers think it’s crazy to trust the vaccine. The majority are actively discouraged from understanding what life is like for refugees, immigrants, the unhoused, the addicted, the disabled, and victims of war.

If a shared sense of reality is required for sanity, then capitalism makes us all crazy.

Capitalists share a common understanding of reality. They know there are two classes, and what benefits the one hurts the other. If they allowed the majority to share that understanding, then workers would have no reason to tolerate capitalist rule and every reason to replace it with international cooperation.

To prevent a shared sense of reality, capitalists employ a class of professionals, experts, and bureaucrats to manage workers’ perceptions and expectations.

The Provincial Health Officer for British Columbia recently announced that public release of information about COVID cases in schools would be limited because parents find it too anxiety provoking. In other words, if you knew the truth, you would be frightened, so we won’t tell you. The public are treated like children whose fears must be managed by superior beings with more emotional control.

All super-hero stories assume that ordinary people must be shielded from the truth or they will panic and behave irrationally. In the pilot episode of Marvel’s Agents of SHIELD, a new agent is asked if he understands SHIELD’s mission. He replies, “We protect people from news they’re not ready to hear.” From the earliest age, we are taught that solving social problems is best left to stronger, wiser beings.

Marxism rips away the curtain of capitalist deception by declaring that there are two social classes, and what benefits the one hurts the other. Once that understanding of reality is widely shared, only one question remains: which side are you on?

What to do now?

At this point, someone typically asks, “That’s all very well, but what do we do now? People are suffering now. We can’t wait for the revolution to help them.”

There are two things we can do now. First, tell the truth.

Mental suffering is not a medical defect, but a protest against oppression. It can be a huge relief to know that you are not crazy, that the world is crazy, and the world can be changed.

Second, we need to demand that people be offered solutions that work for them.

Psychological approaches work best for those whose basic needs are met. They don’t work for the majority whose suffering is rooted in oppression and exploitation.

People in crisis need a safe space where their autonomy is assured and their needs are met for as long as necessary. Instead of providing such support, capitalism subjects the sufferer to stigmatization, forced detention, and harmful medical interventions.

Build a shared reality

Social problems demand social solutions. The personal support that individuals can give each other is limited and difficult to sustain.

The only way to end social suffering is to fight for a socialist society that supports all its members without exception. Every increase in social support we win is a step in the right direction. The fight itself is therapeutic.

While capitalists treat the collective as a source of danger, psychologists at the University of Sussex found that activists who engage in strikes and political demonstrations report a sense of strength and mutual support that reduced feelings of pain, anxiety, and depression. According to the lead researcher,

The development of a shared identity transforms a fragmented crowd into a collective subject capable of acting against those it sees as attacking its members or denying them their rights. Such empowered action engenders positive emotions that benefit health and well-being.

Collective struggle is powerful medicine, and socialism is the cure we desperately need.

(For more on this subject, see Rebel Minds)



  1. To the point, brimming with insight and, in all, another vital read from Susan Rosenthal. Thank you. Shall be sharing through my Networks in the UK and Ireland.

  2. Very interesting post could not agree more.

    I have always been suspicious of psychology as from my point of view it does little more than enforce societal norms.
    It never evolves unless it is forced to by activists’ pressure, like it was the case when homosexuality was considered an illness (aka a threat to social norms and capitalism).

    Thank you for your work!


  3. As usual, a brilliant polemic essay from Susan Rosenthal.
    All those on the broad-left, and beyond, take note!

  4. I am laughing with gratitude for this totally un-abashed presentation of how capitalism makes us crazy. A psychology that does not acknowledge the terrors of living under capitalism can’t help us. There is a debate going on right now in the cultural-historical activity theory corner of psychology (Vygotskian) about this. I’ll forward this piece to that group. Thank you, Susan!

  5. Thank you for pointing out the dissociation I experience when discussing capitalism with people (many of whom are mental health advocates and peer support specialists). Keep telling the truth!

  6. Who are the experts and professionals that are distorting public perceptions and lowering expectations? Perhaps this essay could have elaborated on this critical point.

    How will the working class, who are constantly exposed to and indoctrinated by capitalist-controlled media, know they are being fed nonsense?

    • Ken – Capitalism is a system of social relationships. The relationship between capitalists and workers is that the former exploit the latter. This reality is hidden by capitalist institutions that block all challenges to capitalist rule. These include the police, the mass media, and the legal, education, and medical systems. Their stranglehold on society can be broken only by organizations that validate workers lived experience and unite them in struggle against their common enemy.

  7. Thank you for all your brilliant work, dear Susan. I’ve read some of your books and many of your articles and they’ve been extremely helpful. They’ve given me a much better understanding of the world and they’ve also helped me come to terms with my own emotional issues at a difficult time of my life.

    There’s an important matter that needs to be addressed, though: “The fight itself is therapeutic,” you say. It can be, but that’s only one side of the coin. I’ve been an activist for decades, so I know the other side: activist burnout is a common phenomenon though it usually goes unnoticed. It doesn’t only lead to people dropping out of collective action. It can also lead to a deterioration of one’s mental and physical health, even causing premature death. That happened to one of my comrades, years ago; it was a huge loss and I’m still grieving for her. Back in those days, we knew nothing about burnout, so we weren’t able to help.

    Now some of us are better informed, but we still haven’t found a way to deal with activist burnout effectively. Although the problem is occasionally discussed in feminist and LGBTQI+ circles, it’s totally ignored inside the left. We talk about the bright side of activism, the sense of hope and empowerment it provides, treating burnt out comrades as if they’re lazy, indifferent or unaware of the importance of the work we do. If they’re struggling with disappointment, they get blamed for it.

    Isn’t it time we start talking honestly about the dark side of activism? We may not be able to eliminate burnout, but at least we may find ways to deal with it more effectively.

    • Lisa – I agree with you. Not all ways of fighting are therapeutic. Leaders on the left tend to push people in disrespectful ways, in the mistaken belief that this will hasten the revolution. I understand their sense of urgency; we all feel it. However, pushing people beyond what they would choose to do is damaging, because they can never do enough. This is the same message we get from our capitalist masters!

      I’ve identified this problem as ‘managerialism.’ People don’t need to be managed, they need to be motivated to organize, and there’s a world of difference between the two.

      Individuals are limited in what we can do. The more people work together, the more they can accomplish. We cannot save others; we can only invite them to join us in saving us all. There is no substitute for patiently building organization.

      It’s hypocritical to call for a democratic society that supports its members, when your organization is not democratic, does not have confidence in its members, and does not support them. We must change this way of functioning in order to become fit to replace capitalist rule.

  8. Great article Susan. Just two comments. On the issue of the profession of psychology. One of my favorite examples is the one given by Garth Wood in “The Myth of Neurosis.” He said people who were given a friendly voice on the phone, were much better off than those seeing a psychologist for many years, and never improving. The other comment is around your discussion of the “brain-body.” I’ve been reading, and watching YouTube videos about the mind-brain problem… and getting nowhere. I’ll have to read some more on your brain-body analysis. Any suggestions? Thanks.

    • Pance – I recommend this article by Thomas Verny which is based on his book, The Embodied Mind (2021).

  9. Dr.Rosenthal, greetings from Greece.
    It’s such a great relief that somebody takes ALWAYS the side of the oppressed! Always and unconditionally!
    It’s always so difficult for someone to pick out the best points of your articles because they are so dense. But this phrase stating that “Even if you could measure the overall amount of your brain’s dopamine, the next second it would be different”, is so revealing.
    I’ve read Dr.Moncrieff’s “The Myth of Chemical Cure” and she is saying that evidence shows there is no fixed brain chemistry in humans. So, where does this “chemical imbalance theory” come from? How can it be that so many physicians repeat this outright lie that locates the problem in our “defective” chemistry?
    I’ve also been amazed by your argument in Rebel Minds, against mainstream understanding of “schizophrenia” as a “biochemical abnormality”. This question “Who can tell which delusion is ‘normal’ and which is ‘abnormal’ since everyone of us has delusions?” has haunted me ever since.
    But the real major point in the present article I believe is this: “Under capitalism there is no shared reality because capitalists block genuine communication”.
    I, as a white man, surely can’t grasp how life is for a Muslim woman in racist Islamophobic Greece. Nor for somebody from the ethic minority of Turks, living in northern Greece under constant bullying by local fascist thugs and state officials.
    But being personally a sufferer of CFS (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome), I definitely can say that other people, also, can’t grasp how devastating and disabling a chronic condition can be! So your phrase “Every morning I wake up with a sense of dread” hit home!
    That’s why everyone of us thinks of the others as ‘lunatics’ or ‘crazy’ when they act ‘incomprehensibly’. We know so little about their pain and horrible dead-ends.
    Capitalism is the deepest darkness ever. I’ve never felt so scared to death, desperate and helpless.
    But your articles are like a beacon and a relief in this living hell. Please keep on shedding light to everybody!

    • Elijah – Thank you for your heart-felt comment. When we scratch the surface, we find a huge amount of pain that the system refuses to acknowledge. Instead, it stigmatizes sufferers to prevent them from seeing how much they have in common.

      Robert Whitaker explains how the theory of chemical imbalance was invented as a marketing strategy for psychiatric drugs in his book, Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America. Highly recommended!

  10. Thank you for this revolutionary article. While I, of course, agree with you on many points you make, I have the following response to the following comment. “Marxism aims to transform human experience through social revolution. Psychology strives to adapt individuals to capitalism as an alternative to social revolution.” This statement does not capture what some of us are doing in the therapy room. What I am doing is creating a holding environment (Rogers) in order to allow clients to begin to connect and awaken to their authentic self.

    When a client connects with their core self, they become a whole intact person. (This does not happen overnight or with pharmaceuticals — a true culprit in forced adaptation.) At this juncture, I believe the person will see through the ruling paradigm and will no longer tolerate it. One reason the revolution you talk about could fail, is because when an inauthentic person comes into power they will subject to the false self, someone they have had to create in order to survive in the first place. This false self is much more subject to corruption than a person who has awakened, through a pure therapeutic relationship, to our interconnectedness as humans on a finite planet.

    • Virginia – It’s impossible for anyone to become a “whole intact person” under capitalist rule. We are a highly social species. If we open our hearts to the immense cruelty of capitalism, we are traumatized. If we close ourselves off to it, we lose our humanity.

      In 2007, I posted a review of two books on this subject:

      In Revolution from Within (1992), Gloria Steinem insists that raising self-esteem can change the world. This belief has grown within the middle class in direct proportion to their inability to change the world.

      In We’ve Had a Hundred Years of Psychotherapy – And the World’s Getting Worse (1992), James Hillman and Michael Ventura argue that by emphasizing the “inner soul,” therapy pulls people away from active protest against the social sources of sickness.

      While supportive psychotherapy can help individuals with individual problems, psychotherapists have no power to solve social problems. Most psychotherapists are woefully ignorant of the social sources of suffering and in no position to awaken anyone politically.

      A genuine socialist revolution does not bring individuals (inauthentic or otherwise) to power. The global working-class comes to power, replacing capitalist rule with mass democracy.

      • Susan, thank you for your reply. I will look into the readings you recommend. I both agree and disagree with the first sentence in your reply. I agree that capitalism is ruthless and robs people of their power in many ways. I just want to send out workers who have had the opportunity to begin to know themselves. I attended a holistic masters’ program whose slogan was “Wake Up and Change the World”. I want to send my folks out as intact as they can be. By the way, I cannot say enough about how your article has encouraged me. Thank you!

        • Virginia – As you know, social support is a fundamental human need. Capitalism robs us of social support, then doles it out as a specialized service to those who can pay. It’s tremendously admirable that service providers dedicate themselves to helping others. Their support can and does save lives. Yet such help is only a band-aid. We need a social revolution that directs the whole of society to meeting people’s needs, including the need for a sustainable, peaceful world.

  11. Doctor, are you accepting new patients?
    Seriously. Have suffered so much over course of 65 years of capitalist abuse, gaslighting and systematic disempowerment. I am not so convinced that Marxism is The Way, though I am sure that there could exist a viable, feasible alternative to both capitalism and Marxism. I think you are precisely on target with your concept of managerialism and its discontents (i.e., anti-managerialists). We need more ideas of this sort, please. No one need be managed, supervised, directed or otherwise be bossed around. We don’t need any ruling class overlords running us. We can just run things ourselves.

    Yes, capitalism made me crazy indeed. Thank you so much for reassuring me that this was not my fault.

    • Bruce – Sadly, doctors can’t fix what ails most of humanity. Nor can there be any compromise, or third option, in the class war over who will lead society and in what direction. Either owners and managers run society for their own enrichment, or workers run society for mutual benefit. The choice is clear: Our problems are global, and capitalism makes international cooperation impossible. Socialism is the only solution. As you say, “We don’t need any ruling class overlords running us. We can just run things ourselves.”


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Immigration: Who Benefits? Who Suffers?

Immigration: Who Benefits? Who Suffers?

There are basically two responses to immigration: the racist response calls for closing borders, and the socialist response calls for workers to be as free to move through the world as the goods they produce.

read more