The derivative related to production, when it is in the unknown state, could be estimated as a range, not one number, therefore it is not arithmetic Marx might have been doing at all, but possibly circuit analysis of the flow of independent capitals, possibly not that independent after all, thus the contradiction, due to how one behaviour of one capital effects the behaviour of another capital.

As Angels edits Marx calculation on that one page 344 of 602 other pages, which does not include the table of authorities of course, we forget once again the “what if question?”

What if Marx was right? What if it wasn’t an error? What if the contradiction and what appears to be erroneous sums, is the actual behaviour of captitals in motion.

Sort of like the error many made in calculating light huh? Light bends, it is not a straight line at all. Thus capital possibly is bending too? Imagine the speed then of decay and growth?

The question is possibly more important than the answer being right, I would guess.

So in my opinion conflict often derives from the paradox of unanswered questions.

Once again, we see that the courts are not neutral; they uphold the undemocratic status quo.

Both the courts and union bureaucrats oppose democratic revolutions – whether they take place in unions or in society.

The battle for democracy will not be settled in the courts, but in the workplace, by workers.

Susan Rosenthal